Characterizing Trends in Diagnosis and Management of Sinusitis in a Large Health Care System: From Primary Care to Otolaryngology.

OBJECTIVES: Variations in management of sinusitis in primary care settings can be associated with inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions and delays in treatment. The objective of this study was to identify patient and provider characteristics associated with possible inaccurate diagnosis and management of sinusitis. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional retrospective analysis using an established regional healthcare database of patients who received a diagnosis of sinusitis between 2011 and 2022 from a non-otolaryngologist provider. Patient's comorbidities, insurance status, chronicity of sinusitis, and prescriptions were included. We noted if patients were referred to an otolaryngology practice and if they received a diagnosis of sinusitis from an otolaryngologist. RESULTS: We analyzed 99 581 unique patients and 168 137 unique encounters. The mean age was 41.5 (±20.4 years) and 35.7% were male. Most patients had private insurance (88.5%), acute sinusitis (81.2%), and were seen at a primary care office (97.8%). Approximately 30% of patients were referred to an otolaryngology practice for sinusitis. Of referred patients, 50.6% did not receive a diagnosis of sinusitis from an otolaryngology practice. Patients without a sinusitis diagnosis by an otolaryngology practice received significantly more mean courses of antibiotics (5.04 vs 2.39, P < .0001) and oral steroids (3.53 vs 2.08, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Over half of the patients referred to an otolaryngology practice from primary care for sinusitis did not receive a diagnosis of sinusitis from an otolaryngology practice. Further research should investigate implications for increased healthcare costs and inappropriate prescription trends associated with the management of sinusitis.

Prognostic Indicators of Survival in Sinonasal Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: This study offers an update on the epidemiologic and prognostic factors and treatment-specific outcomes in patients diagnosed with sinonasal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: National Cancer Database was queried from 2004 to 2016 for patients with sinonasal DLBCL. Univariate Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox-regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association of suspected prognostic factors with overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 2,222 patients with sinonasal DLBCL were analyzed. OS was 62% at 5 years and 42% at 10 years. Prognostic factors associated with increased survival included African-American race (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.33-0.70), chemotherapy (HR: 0.30, CI: 0.25-0.35), and radiation (HR: 0.80, CI: 0.69-0.93). Prognostic factors associated with decreased survival included patients with Charlson-Deyo scores of 1 (HR: 1.51, CI: 1.25-1.84), 2 (HR: 2.25, CI: 1.67-3.03), and 3 (HR: 2.36, CI: 1.49-3.74) and patients with Lugano stage III (HR: 1.69, CI: 1.09-2.62) and IV (HR: 1.96, CI: 1.46-2.64) disease. Stage-based split multivariate analysis was performed and revealed chemotherapy was independently associated with increased OS in patients with stage I (HR: 0.24, CI: 0.19-0.30), II (HR: 0.17, CI: 0.11-0.28), and IV (HR: 0.41, CI: 0.26-0.64) disease. Radiotherapy was independently associated with increased OS in patients with stage I disease only (HR: 0.67, CI: 0.55-0.83), while immunotherapy was an independent prognostic factor in patients with stage IV disease only (HR: 0.60, CI: 0.37-0.98). CONCLUSION: This study is the largest to date to analyze the association of demographic features and treatment modalities with OS in patients with sinonasal DLBCL. It is the first to investigate the association of immunotherapy with OS in this population. A combination treatment of immunochemotherapy or radioimmunochemotherapy confers increased survival, particularly in patients with advanced disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 132:1515-1522, 2022.

The possibility of short-term hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression with high-volume, high-dose nasal mometasone irrigation in postsurgical patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Medically refractory chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is often treated with functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) and high-volume steroid nasal irrigation. While budesonide is the most common steroid irrigation for this indication, mometasone has a superior pharmacokinetic profile, which may allow dose escalation. The safety and efficacy of mometasone at higher concentrations than previously used in treating CRS have not been explored. METHODS: Patients were recruited from a tertiary level clinic between June 2018 and December 2019. Inclusion criteria included adults (>18 years); CRS diagnosis; previous FESS; pre-treatment morning cortisol within normal range; minimum of twice daily high-volume sinonasal mometasone irrigations (total dose of 4 mg) for 12 weeks; and post-treatment morning cortisol measured within 2 weeks following the study period. Patients with potential for endogenous or exogenous disruption of the HPA axis were excluded. RESULTS: 14 patients were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. In all but one patient, pre- and post-treatment morning cortisol levels were not significantly different and were within normal limits (6.7-25.4 µg/dL). Following an uninterrupted 12-week treatment course, no evidence of HPA axis suppression was found (P = 0.915). The single patient who was found to have a low (1.3 µg/dL) post-treatment morning serum cortisol level reportedly received an intraarticular steroid shot several days prior to the blood draw. She remained asymptomatic and her rechecked serum cortisol was within normal limits at 12.3 µg/dL. CONCLUSIONS: High-volume 2 mg twice daily sinonasal mometasone irrigations did not cause HPA axis suppression in a representative sample of patients with refractory CRS post-FESS with normal baseline cortisol levels.

Distinct Histopathologic Features of Complicated Sinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Sinusitis complicated by intracranial or orbital extension can be life-threatening and require emergent intervention. Histologic features of complicated sinusitis have yet to be determined and may have significant implications for understanding pathophysiology. METHODS: A structured histopathology report was utilized to analyze sinus tissue extracted during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). A total of 13 histopathology variables were compared between patients with complicated sinusitis (CS), CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP), and CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). RESULTS: About 24 CS, 149 uncomplicated CRSsNP, and 191 uncomplicated CRSwNP patients were analyzed. Nasal tissue from CS and CRSwNP patients demonstrated similar levels of overall inflammation (66.7% vs. 69.6% with moderate/severe inflammation, P = .466). Relative to CRSsNP, CS patients showed significantly greater overall inflammation (66.7% vs. 41.6%, P = .019). CS patients demonstrated significantly fewer eosinophils per high power field (eos/HPF) and eosinophil aggregates compared to CRSwNP patients (20.8% vs. 70.7% with 5+eos/HPF, P < .0001; 4.2% vs. 33.5%, P < .0001). Relative to CRSsNP patients, CS patients demonstrated enhanced neutrophil infiltration (45.8% vs. 28.0%, P = .011). About 91.7% of CS patients demonstrated a lymphoplasmacytic predominant inflammatory infiltrate, compared to 69.8% of CRSsNP and 62.8% of CRSwNP patients (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Significant histopathological differences were evident in patients with CS, CRSsNP, and CRSwNP. CS patients did not perfectly fit either a CRSsNP or CRSwNP profile, underscoring the importance of delineating the histopathological features of CS. This study offers insight into the histologic aspects of CS, providing initial evidence that it is an aggressive neutrophilic inflammatory process.

Temporal patterns of nasal symptoms in patients with mild severity SARS-CoV-2 infection.

BACKGROUND: No study to date has analyzed the progression of sinonasal symptoms over time in COVID-19 patients. The purpose of this study is to analyze the progression of sinonasal symptoms and risk factors for olfactory dysfunction in the mild severity COVID-19 patient. METHODS: An internet survey was used to assess sinonasal symptoms in patients with COVID-19. Changes in rhinologic domain and symptom-specific Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores were compared at five time points: two weeks before diagnosis, at diagnosis, two weeks after diagnosis, four weeks after diagnosis, and six months after diagnosis. RESULTS: 521 responses were collected. Rhinologic domain SNOT-22 scores increased significantly (p < 0.001) to 8.94 at the time of diagnosis, remained elevated two weeks post-diagnosis (5.14, p = 0.004), and decreased significantly four weeks post-diagnosis (3.14, p = 0.004). Smell-specific SNOT-22 scores peaked at the time of diagnosis (2.05, p < 0.001), remained elevated two weeks after diagnosis (1.19, p < 0.001), and returned to baseline four weeks post-diagnosis (0.64, p > 0.999). Taste-specific SNOT-22 scores also peaked at diagnosis (2.06, p < 0.001), remained elevated two weeks after diagnosis (1.19, p < 0.001), and returned to baseline four weeks after diagnosis (0.71, p > 0.999). There were no significant differences in sense of smell or taste between 1-month and 6-month timepoints. CONCLUSION: Sinonasal symptoms, particularly loss of smell and taste, may be important presenting symptoms in the mild severity COVID-19 patient. Our findings support incorporating these symptoms into screening protocols. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Inter-pathologist Agreement on Structured Histopathology Reporting in Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Structured histopathology reporting is increasingly being utilized in rhinology to characterize endotypes in chronic rhinosinusitis and guide management decisions after sinus surgery. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this investigation is to evaluate inter-observer agreement in structured histopathology reporting. METHODS: Two experienced head and neck pathologists independently compiled structured histopathology reports for tissue samples collected during functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Cohen's standard kappa (κ) coefficients were calculated for each histopathologic variable to assess inter-pathologist agreement. RESULTS: A total of 92 cases were analyzed. Substantial inter-pathologist agreement was reached on tissue eosinophil count (κ = 0.64, P < .001), the presence of eosinophil aggregates (κ = 0.62, P < .001), and the presence of fungal elements (κ = 0.74, P < .001). There was moderate agreement on the degree of inflammation (κ = 0.56, P < .001) and the presence of squamous metaplasia (κ = 0.46, P < .001). There was fair agreement on the presence of neutrophil infiltrates (κ = 0.33, P < .001), the presence of hyperplastic changes (κ = 0.40, P < .001), and the presence of fibrosis (κ = 0.24, P = .022). There was only slight agreement on the degree of subepithelial edema (κ = 0.20, P = .008). The κ coefficients for basement membrane thickening and mucosal ulceration were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: High inter-pathologist agreement was demonstrated for several salient histopathologic variables, including tissue eosinophil count and the presence of eosinophil aggregates. However, refining the definitions of certain histopathologic variables may improve the reproducibility of structured histopathology reporting.

Prognostic Indicators in Base of Tongue Adenocarcinoma: A Population-Based Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The objectives of this investigation are to characterize the epidemiology of base of tongue adenocarcinoma utilizing a population-based database and to identify prognostic factors that may affect survival. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox-regression analysis were performed to evaluate the association of suspected prognostic factors with survival. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were the primary outcome measures. RESULTS: A total of 176 cases were eligible based on inclusion criteria. The 5-year OS and DSS were 49% and 66%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, surgical management was associated with improved OS and DSS (OS hazard ratio [HR]: 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20-0.58, P < .001; DSS HR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.09-0.48, P < .001), while higher tumor grade was associated with worse OS and DSS (OS HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.14-2.19, P = .006; DSS HR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.01-2.79, P = .045). Administration of chemotherapy or radiation did not have a significant association with OS or DSS. CONCLUSION: This investigation is the largest to date to analyze the base of tongue adenocarcinoma as its own entity. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment, and lower tumor grade is associated with improved survival in these patients. Administration of radiation or chemotherapy was not associated with improved survival.

Enhanced recovery protocol for transoral robotic surgery demonstrates improved analgesia and narcotic use reduction.

BACKGROUND: No study has evaluated the impact of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol on opioid usage among patients undergoing transoral robotic surgery (TORS). METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients undergoing TORS were enrolled in an ERAS protocol and compared to control patients. Primary outcome measures included postoperative mean morphine equivalent dose (MED), Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) pain scores, and opioid prescriptions on discharge. RESULTS: The mean MED administered postoperatively was lower in the ERAS group (17.6 mg) than in the control group (65.0 mg) (p < .001). Average postoperative DVPRS scores were 2.9 in the ERAS group vs. 4.2 in the control group (p = .042). Fewer patients in the ERAS group received opioid prescriptions on discharge (31.6%) than controls (96.2%) (p < .001). CONCLUSION: The TORS ERAS protocol is associated with reduced postoperative opioid usage, lower pain scores, and reduced opioid requirements on discharge.

Histopathologic Influences of Comorbid Smoking Status in Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Smoking status has been established as a known irritant of the upper and lower respiratory tracts, leading to inflammation throughout the respiratory system. Tobacco smoking is one comorbidity encountered among chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients. The histopathologic features of CRS and comorbid smoking status have yet to be determined by structured histopathology and may have important implications on disease management. METHODS: Retrospective study of structured histopathology reports analyzing sinus tissue removed during functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Histopathology variables were compared among patients with CRS who were reported as never smokers, former smokers, or current smokers. RESULTS: A total of 285 CRS patients were included: 173 never smokers, 85 former smokers, and 27 current smokers. When compared with former smokers, current smokers demonstrated increased basement membrane thickening (88.9% vs 67.1%, P <.020). Compared with never smokers, former and current smokers collectively demonstrated increased hyperplastic changes (14.3% vs 6.9%, P < .035), increased squamous metaplasia (26.8% vs 17.3%, P < .040), and trends toward increased basement membrane thickening (72.3% vs 65.3%, P < .124) and increased fibrosis (47.3% vs 40.5%, P < .154). CONCLUSION: Smoking status may influence histopathologic tissue-level changes in CRS disease. Interestingly, former and current smokers maintained few differences in histopathology. However, former and current smokers collectively demonstrated increased chronic inflammatory changes compared with never smokers. These findings suggest that the timing of smoking exposure has limited effect on the tissue level, rather exposure overall influences inflammatory change. These findings may have important implications on medical and surgical management of CRS disease and comorbid smoking status.

Aggregate Prevalence of Chemosensory and Sinonasal Dysfunction in SARS-CoV-2 and Related Coronaviruses.

Much of the published literature regarding the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) constitutes lower respiratory system symptomatology, while there exists a paucity of data describing the complicated sequelae of the upper respiratory system, including chemosensory and/or sinonasal dysfunction. This study utilized the National Library of Medicine's PubMed/MEDLINE database to query for articles describing COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-1, MERS-CoV, and other coronaviruses, with any mention of smell, taste, or other chemosensory or sinonasal dysfunction. Aggregate analysis demonstrated an incidence of 49.6% (n = 497 of 1002; 95% CI, 46.5%-52.7%), 47.9% (n = 480 of 1002; 95% CI, 44.8%-51.0%), and 17.9% (n = 880 of 4909; 95% CI, 16.9%-19.0%) for smell loss, taste loss, and smell or taste loss, respectively, in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Additionally, there were significantly higher incidences of runny nose/rhinorrhea/rhinitis and nasal congestion/obstruction/blockage in other coronaviruses as compared with SARS-CoV-2 (P < .001). Understanding these less well-characterized symptoms may help develop measures for estimating early markers of disease prevalence and/or resolution. Level of evidence: 4.

An Update on Level of Evidence Trends in Facial Plastic Surgery Research.

Background: Knowledge of the quality of evidence in facial plastic surgery research is essential for the implementation of evidence-based practices. The purpose of this study is to provide an update over the past decade as to whether the level of evidence in leading journals featuring topics in facial plastic surgery has changed in comparison with prior reports. Materials and Methods: This study is a systematic review, designed to evaluate the level of evidence observed in the facial plastic surgery literature over time. Five journals were queried using facial plastic surgery keywords for four selected years for a 10-year period. After screening, articles were assessed for the presence of various methodological traits and were evaluated for overall level of evidence. These variables were compared across the years studied to evaluate trends in level of evidence. Results: A total of 826 articles were included for final review. For all selected years, level IV or level V evidence was the most prevalent level of evidence. Over time, significantly less level IV (p = 0.009) and significantly more level II (p = 0.007) evidence was published. The proportion of studies reporting confidence intervals (p < 0.001) and p-values (p = 0.02) were significantly greater in later years. Conclusions: The level of evidence of facial plastic surgery literature has increased over time, as demonstrated by an increased proportion of level II evidence, decreased proportion of level IV evidence, and increased use of p-values and confidence intervals. The absolute number of randomized controlled trials continues to remain low.

The Association of Serum Eosinophilia with Structured Histopathology in Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have demonstrated associations between serum eosinophilia and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) pathogenesis. However, the association of serum eosinophilia with histopathology profiling in CRS has not been fully delineated and may help better characterize CRS disease burden prior to surgery. METHODS: A structured histopathology report of 13 variables was utilized to analyze sinus tissue removed during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Complete blood count (CBC) with differential was drawn within 4 weeks prior to FESS. Serum eosinophilia was defined as >6.0% (>0.60 th/µL). Histopathology variables were compared among patients. RESULTS: A total of 177 CRS patients (37 with serum eosinophilia and 140 with normal serum eosinophilia) were analyzed. Compared to CRS patients with normal serum eosinophil counts, CRS patients with serum eosinophilia demonstrated increased polypoid disease (67.6% vs 35.0%, P < .001), eosinophil aggregates (45.9% vs 20.7%, P = .003), and eosinophils per high-power field (>5/HPF) (67.6% vs 40.7%, P = .003). CONCLUSION: CRS patients with serum eosinophilia demonstrated severe disease burden on histopathology with high levels of polypoid disease and tissue eosinophilia. However, a considerable number of patients without serum eosinophilia demonstrated eosinophilic disease on histopathology, indicating that preoperative serum eosinophilia alone could not be reliably used to predict eosinophilic CRS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Effect of margin status and pathological grade in treatment of sinonasal mucoepidermoid carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of demographic factors, grade, margin status, and treatment modalities for overall survival in patients with sinonasal mucoepidermoid carcinoma (SNMEC). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database review. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients of all ages with SNMEC between 2004 and 2015. Univariate Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association of suspected prognostic factors with overall survival. Subgroup analysis by margin status and grade was performed. RESULTS: A total of 239 patients with SNMEC were included in the analysis. The 5-year overall survival was 63.6%. Prognostic factors associated with decreased survival include age over 70 years (P = .027), sphenoid primary site (P = .002), and advanced-stage malignancy (P = .024). Improved survival was associated with surgery achieving negative margins (P = .001). Adjuvant radiation was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.25, P = .015) in the negative-margin group but was not found to be a statistically significant factor in the positive-margin group (HR = 0.66, P = .509). CONCLUSIONS: This investigation is the largest to date to analyze the association of treatment modalities with overall survival in SNMEC and subgroup analysis by histopathologic grade and surgical margin status of treatment outcomes. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment in patients with SNMEC. However, administration of radiation may confer survival benefit to patients with negative margins. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 2020.

Treatment modalities in sinonasal mucosal melanoma: A national cancer database analysis.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of demographic factors, tumor stage, and treatment modalities for overall survival in patients with sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database review. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients of all ages with SNMM between 2004 and 2015. Univariate Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association of suspected prognostic factors with overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 1,874 patients with SNMM were included in the analysis. The 5-year overall survival was 24%. Prognostic factors associated with decreased survival include advanced age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.03), T4 disease (HR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.09-1.89), and presence of distant metastases (HR: 3.22. 95% CI: 2.06-5.04). Improved survival was associated with surgical resection only when margins were negative (HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.30-0.65). In patients with metastatic disease, administration of immunotherapy (HR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.04-0.49) was associated with improved survival. Surgical approach, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were nonsignificant predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation is the largest to date to analyze the association of treatment modalities with overall survival in SNMM. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment in patients with SNMM. However, administration of immunotherapy may confer survival benefit to patients with metastatic disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 130:275-282, 2020.

Survival in low-grade and high-grade sinonasal adenocarcinoma: A national cancer database analysis.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to investigate survival differences between low-grade and high-grade sinonasal adenocarcinoma (SNAC) by examining demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment modalities. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with SNAC between 2004 and 2015. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for all cases of SNAC. Subsequent analysis focused on low-grade (grade 1 and grade 2) and high-grade (grade 3 and grade 4) SNAC. RESULTS: A total of 1,288 patients with SNAC were included in the main cohort and divided into low grade (n = 601) and high grade (n = 370). The 5-year overall survival for all patients, low-grade, and high-grade was 54%, 64%, and 38%, respectively. Prognostic factors associated with decreased survival for the main cohort include advanced age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.06), Charlson-Deyo score (HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.05-1.78), grade 2 (HR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.26-3.86], grade 3 (HR: 3.67; 95% CI: 2.09-6.45), and grade 4 (HR: 3.31; 95% CI: 1.38-7.91). Radiotherapy was associated with improved overall survival for high-grade SNAC (HR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.24-0.70) but not for low-grade SNAC (HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.59-1.85). CONCLUSIONS: This investigation is the largest to date analyzing the association of treatment modalities with overall survival in SNAC. Surgery remains paramount to treatment, with radiotherapy offering additional survival benefit for high-grade SNAC. Administration of chemotherapy was not associated with improved survival. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:E1-E10, 2020.

Enhanced recovery after surgery in head and neck surgery: Reduced opioid use and length of stay.

OBJECTIVES: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols were first developed in colorectal surgery and sought to standardize patient care. There have been several studies in the head and neck surgical literature looking at outcomes after ERAS protocol, but no studies focusing on narcotic use and length of stay. This study aimed to evaluate narcotic usage and length of stay, in addition to several other outcomes, following the implementation of an ERAS protocol. METHODS: A head and neck-specific ERAS protocol was implemented at this tertiary care center beginning July 2017. A retrospective cohort study was performed comparing this cohort to that of a retrospective control group. Outcomes included mean morphine equivalent dose, mean pain score, and percentage of patients prescribed narcotics on discharge. Secondary outcomes included ICU and total length of stay. RESULTS: The mean morphine equivalent dose (MED) administered within 72 hours postoperatively was significantly lower in the ERAS group (17.5 ± 46.0 mg vs. 82.7 ± 116.1 mg, P < .001). Average postoperative pain scores in the first 72 hours were lower in the ERAS group (2.6 ± 1.8 vs. 3.6 ± 1.9; P < .001). The average length of stay was shorter for ERAS patients (7.8 ± 4.8 vs. 9.7 ± 4.7 days, P = .008); however, there was no significant difference in ICU length of stay. CONCLUSION: Following implementation of an ERAS protocol, patients undergoing head and neck surgery had decreased narcotic use in the immediate postoperative period and at discharge, while also demonstrating improved postoperative analgesia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3 Laryngoscope, 130:1227-1232, 2020.

The Effects of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery on Voice Characteristics in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is a standard treatment modality for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) who have failed appropriate medical therapy. However, FESS entails modification of the upper airway tract that may alter phonatory resonance and produce voice changes. The effects of FESS on postoperative voice characteristics in patients with CRS have yet to be quantitatively assessed. METHODS: Patients with severe CRS who underwent FESS at a tertiary care referral center between May and October 2017 were prospectively enrolled. The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) and the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) were used to quantitatively evaluate voice characteristics and quality of life, respectively. Preoperative and postoperative CAPE-V and VHI scores were compared with postoperative scores for each patient. Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores were also obtained to assess changes in patient symptoms. RESULTS: 18 CRS patients undergoing FESS were enrolled. The average preoperative Lund-Mackay score was 14, indicating baseline severe CRS. Postoperative assessments demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in CAPE-V (45-27, p = .005) and VHI (10-4.7, p < .001) scores. These correlated with a statistically significant decrease in SNOT-22 scores (42-13, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CRS experience a significant improvement in voice characteristics and vocal quality of life following FESS. Furthermore, this appears to correlate with a significant decrease in self-reported disease severity. These findings may augment the discussion of potential benefits of FESS to a new potential domain for voice quality.

The impact of race and insurance status on baseline histopathology profile in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an inflammatory disease process characterized by different phenotypes and histopathology profiles. Race and access to care have been implicated in CRS disease severity. Structural histopathology reporting may aid in delineating the inflammatory burden responsible for this effect. METHODS: A structured histopathology report of 14 variables was utilized to assess sinus tissue removed during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Histopathology variables and 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores were compared by race (Black, White, Latino, and Asian) and insurance status (Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance). RESULTS: A total of 201 CRS patients (124 White, 38 Black, 28 Latino, and 9 Asian) undergoing FESS were included. Black patients demonstrated increased SNOT-22 scores (50.74 ± 20.32 vs 41.47 ± 22.75, p < 0.022) and number of eosinophils per high-power field (>5/HPF) (60.5% vs 44.8%, p < 0.05). White patients demonstrated decreased eosinophil aggregates (22.6% vs 35.1%, p < 0.039) and eosinophils/HPF (<5/HPF) (42.7% vs 55.8%, p < 0.048). Medicaid patients showed increased SNOT-22 score (55.50 ± 24.46 vs 41.39 ± 21.74, p < 0.003), polypoid disease (61.5% vs 42.3%, p < 0.05), subepithelial edema (80.8% vs 53.1%, p < 0.006), hyperplastic/papillary changes (23.1% vs 8.0%, p < 0.028), fibrosis (61.5% vs 38.5%, p < 0.036), eosinophil aggregates (46.2% vs 24.6%, p < 0.022), and eosinophils/HPF (>5/HPF) (65.4% vs 45.1%, p < 0.043). When controlling for insurance status, Black race was no longer associated with increased SNOT-22 (p < 0.104) or eosinophils/HPF (>5/HPF) (p < 0.183). CONCLUSION: Black and Medicaid patients demonstrated more severe disease by histopathology and SNOT-22 scores. These findings were no longer significant among Black patients after adjusting for insurance status, suggesting that the prevailing factor influencing worse disease may be access to care.